|
|
|
|
By Alicia Adams-Glover |
By Jenny Glenn |
|
By Bill Kemp |
By Nona Keith-Henson |
The
Global Strategists are pleased to present our individual reports for Week
10. We selected these two topics in order to investigate in depth the ability
of Starbucks Corporation to succeed in two cultures that are very different
from the United States.
By:Alicia
Adams-Glover
The foundation of Starbucks’ operations and South Korean society and culture are two inimitably different social harmonies.In evaluating social makeup of divergent societies and cultures, international business strategies propose that there are two aspects that help to assess these differences. They are individual and/or collective beliefs, and the dimension of class structure; both can adversely affect the operations of an organization (Hill, 2003). Evaluating South Korea’s social structure using these dimensions reveals the guiding principles of its social cohesion are based on the teachings of Confucianism, which focuses on group dynamic as opposed to individual progress, and is strained by the growing income disparity. The strong belief in Confucianism is a guiding rule of social order and conduct for many Koreans; it is an integral part of Korean culture that provides a system of societal commitments. In this case, Korean people (and by extension –Korean society) is more focused on the ‘collective’ whereas Starbucks (being an American company) may be perceived as ‘individualistic.’On the other hand, thereported unequal distribution of income and the downfall of the middle class threaten the social unity of its citizens.
The focus of this report is on the social infrastructure of South Korea. It assesses South Korea’s social infrastructure by using indicators such as the state of health, the stability of the education system, the unemployment and poverty rates, and the challenges of the growing aging populace.It provides a brief synopsis of the country’s attempt at contributing to the society’s social harmony through the development of social policies and safety nets. The implications, if any, on the operations of Starbucks Coffee Korea are analyzed.
The first factor under review is the outlook of health in South Korea.Thanks to advancements in the medical and health sciences, the overall health conditions of South Koreans have improved over the years. Medical care services have become widely available and accessible.According to the Ministry of Health and Welfares’ report on the public’s health status, Koreans are now experiencing an increase in life expectancy (good and bad implications), better nutrition, and quality health services. The disparity of quality health services provided among the social classes is a concern as it is in many countries, such as the U.S. who struggles with similar anguish.So, how has the improved state of health transcends itself to operating efficiencies of an organization?In particular, how does the level of care provided to South Koreans affect Starbucks’ operations? Whether good, bad, or indifferent the level of care leads to a sickly society. Therefore, the stability, and availability of quality health care system are crucial to the well being of Starbucks’ employees and its customers. An inadequate system that provides little to no preventive or treatment care could mean bad health conditions for employees and customers surviving with aliments.From an employer’s standpoint, this could in turn increase employee absenteeism, call for an increase in employee allotted sick leave–in the long run an increase in health cost is probable. If people have to pay more for quality care, Starbucks will have to pay more in premiums.Conversely, if Starbucks picks up most of the tab, can it attract well-educated and skilled workers due to this benefit? Probably so, with health inflation on the rise an increase in benefits plan of health coverage for employees and dependents could be a deciding factor for someone choosing to manage a Starbucks store versus another organization. From a retail operating perspective, a sickly customer base means reduced revenue.
The
effectiveness and availability of education is the second factor evaluated.
Education is undoubtedly, a resource base that develops productivity and
competitiveness. Along with stabilizing its currency and investment growth,
education has been a leading source behind South Korea’s advancement, and
rebuilding from the Asian crisis.Koreans
are known to have an innate enthusiasm for education. South Korea’s literacy
rate as of 2002 was 98% (CIA Factbook). The advancement of its education
system is noticeable by the increase in the number of schools.According
to the Educational Statistics 2002 annual report the number of schools
has increased from 3,000 in 1945 to 19,124 in 2002 (Ministry of Education
and Human Resource Development). The increase suggests that South Korea
has placed priority in educating its people, and in building the foundation
that is necessary to achieve this goal.In
fulfilling Starbucks recruitment and staffing needs it depends on a country’s
populace in producing an educated and skilled workforce.As
noted in the overview of South Korea’s education system, the population
is highly literate and produces a large number of highly educated people.
However, the perceived impediment to Starbucks is somewhat complicated,
a highly educated staff could pose a threat to Starbucks employee stability
because it may lead to unmotivated and disloyal employees.Starbucks
could be faced with unsatisfied workers, who feel they are underpaid for
the level of knowledge.The impact
is high employee turnover, and reduces employee retention which leads to
increased recruitment and training cost, especially since Starbucks puts
forth an extreme effort in educating and training its employees on providing
top customer service and brewing coffee.On
the other hand, the threat could be overridden by strong collectivism beliefs
where loyalty is a key ethnic attribute and moving from one company to
another company is discourage because of the value placed on group association.
The
third aspect is the level of poverty and unemployment in South Korea.In
2002, the unemployment rate was 3.1%(CIA
Factbook), while the poverty rate in 2001 was 4%.Poverty
and unemployment are leading indicators of a country’s specific problems
without its stability other infrastructures suffers. High unemployment
rate and poverty threatens the stability of South Korea’s economy and they
slowdown economic growth. High unemployment results in loss of output (or
gross domestic product-GDP) in the short run.This
in turn leads to lower per capita GDP. The backlash of this is Koreans
not having enough disposable income available to purchase Starbucks coffee.Continued
periods of high unemployment and rising poverty levels could lead to social
instability in the country, which in turn can lead to political crises.One
only has to look as far as South America for numerous examples of these.Continued
decline in GDP and/or GDP growth leaves the country with less money to
invest in both economic and social infrastructure thereby impairing their
ability to attract foreign investment and companies.On
a positive note, as of 2002 Koreans per capita income was 19, 400, a considerable
jump from 1998 (CIA Factbook).It
is safe to say that it allows people the opportunity and affordability
to indulge in specialty coffee.However,
drastic changes in the per capita income will threaten Starbucks sales,
and expansion efforts, as people will not be able to afford the purchase.
This leads to further questions. For instance, can Starbucks offset this
by pricing lower than the competition? Will this strategy give them the
needed competitive advantage? In the end it balls down to whether or not
Starbucks products are deemed affordable and whether or not South Korea
is not deteriorated by an increase in families living below poverty levels
and/or without jobs.
Lastly,
the heighten concern regarding South Korea’s aging population should definitely
not be undervalued or overlooked by Starbucks.South
Korea’s aged population is expected to grow from 7% in 2000 to 10% by 2010,
and 13.2% by 2020 (Korea National Statistical Office). An increasing aging
society will call for more health and support from the government, as well
as the companies they work for. South Korea’s increasing progression towards
an aging society is cause for alarm as it is indicative of a future labor
shortage.The labor shortage will
increase competition among organizations in seeking and hiring employees.What
options are available to Starbucks if the apprehension of an increased
aged society is true?Outside from
a revolving migrating workforce, the only other recourse for Starbucks
is to attract younger employees at an early stage in their employment and
strives for a long-term employment and commitment from them. Although,
recent employee trends exhibit that the retail industrycurrently
has tense competition from the manufacturing industry in attracting employees.
A March 2003, Korea Labor Institute’s labor statistics report revealed
that the retail and trade industry employed roughly 239,000 less than the
manufacturing industry (The Korea Labor Institute, 2003). The
current competitive arena of seeking and retaining qualified employees
among the various industries in South Korea should already have Starbucks
evaluating recruiting efforts. The threat of an aging society suggests
that the historically stable and solid industries, such as manufacturing
are among Starbucks’ top competitors in developing an employment-focused
push that will reach different sets of potential employees.
Preliminary conclusions reveal two features that pose long-term critique by Starbucks. First, can an aging population keep up with the pace of Starbucks stores (the high speed of fulfilling orders) or are they better suited for managerial positions (will they posses the knowledge and sharpness that is needed to manage a segment of a global company)? Second, is the threat of another Asian crisis real, will regional disputes and inflating exchange rate risk give rise to the downturn of the economy? Parts of the answers are linked to Starbucks business culture in anticipating long-term staffing needs, while the other answers are triggered by the not yet known factors of South Korea’s (or its neighboring countries) economic subsistence. Overall, Starbucks Coffee Korea has a favorable growth rate in South Korea.
By:Jenny
Glenn
A
key determinant of social infrastructure is the relative importance of
the individual and the group (Brett; Hill, 2003). Starbucks Corporation
was created in the individual-centric culture of the United States. Since
1995, the company was moved to open stores in Japan, an extremely group-centered
country (Hill, 2003). The challenge for Starbucks is to succeed in a social
infrastructure that in many ways is the mirror opposite of the one the
company was created in. Every assumption about employee recruiting, motivation,
training, and performance may have to be examined and creatively resolved.
Similarly, the American coffee house culture may not translate successfully
into an environment that is oriented towards family and workplace obligations.
The role of women in the workplace is more restricted than in the United
States; women tend to hold administrative jobs, make much less money, and
experience pressure to stop working once they marry. Does this remove an
entire group of people from the pool of potential Starbucks customers?
There
are two uniquely Japanese attributes that raise barriers to Starbucks’
success. The first is that Japan is a tea-drinking society. Tea ceremonies,
teahouses, and tea consumption are deeply venerated, socially important
activities in Japanese society. The second barrier is the social custom
of desk-side tea and coffee service in most large businesses and organizations.
Why would a person purchase expensive Starbucks coffee individually, when
the person can receive free coffee or tea in the office in a way that reinforces
group membership and connection?
As
of April 2003, Starbucks has opened 379 stores in Japan (Starbucks, 2003).
The corporation has established a business foothold in the country. Will
Starbucks continue to expand and flourish? Understanding and responding
appropriately to Japanese social infrastructure will be an important part
of the company’s overall success or failure.
Individual
versus group affiliation cause both obvious and subtle barriers to success
for Starbucks Coffee Japan Ltd. The desire for group affiliation and approval
is paramount in Japanese society. This social orientation is an important
consideration for Starbucks. The company desires to establish coffee shops
as the buffer zone between home and work (Theodore, 2002). The coffee shop
becomes a safe haven from the world, a familiar place to retreat to and
reward oneself. This market positioning is a positive feature for American
consumers, where solitary time is extremely important and freedom from
the demands of others is prized. Individual time in Japan is viewed with
a degree of suspicion and anxiety if it is not directed towards socially
sanctioned goals, such as religious mediation or academic preparations.
Starbucks will need to develop a market position in Japan that emphasizes
the coffee shop as a meeting place for friends, families, and organizations.
Instead of a place to get away from everyone, the coffee shop becomes a
convenient, enjoyable place to stay connected.
Starbucks
Coffee Japan Ltd. has several challenges in establishing the company as
a core part of the Japanese consumer’s daily activities. The company can
focus on store location, store design, and advertising to create an inviting
place for group activities and social connection. A key part of the store
environment is the employees. The importance of the group versus the importance
of the individual is also expressed in the area of employer/employee relationships.
Social
infrastructure includes cultural perceptions of power distance. When Starbucks
moved from America to Japan the company selected a foreign partner that
has significantly different workplace dynamics.The
classic American approach to the work place involves low power distance
and low information context (Brett, 2001). Low power distance means that
line workers do not perceive a great deal of social difference between
themselves and senior levels of management. Workers do not automatically
confer respect or obedience to people in management roles, and are willing
to challenge procedures and policies. Low information context means that
a large amount of detail is used to define expected behavior and to convey
ideas. Low context advertising assumes that the audience does not have
a common viewpoint and must be explicitly shown the benefits and features
of the product being promoted. America is a culture that embraces diversity
and honors the myth of the “melting pot” culture that blends together people
from many countries into a capitalistic democracy. Japan is a high power,
high context society (Brett, 2001), which is consistent with an ethnically
homogenous, centuries-old country.
Japan has a well-educated, disciplined workforce with a strong customer service orientation. These are positive attributes that support the in-store customer experience that Starbucks is trying to create. Starbucks will need to adapt the employee recruitment, training, compensation, and motivation policies developed in America to Japan’s high power distance, high context infrastructure. Another positive factor Starbucks can leverage to recruit a loyal workforce is the Starbucks brand name. Starbucks has one of the most recognized brands in the world with highly favorable connotations (Theodore, 2002). Employer prestige is an important factor in employment decisions, since a significant portion of an individual Japanese person’s status is conferred through professional affiliation.
Government
policies on banking, investment, and personal finance affect the success
of Starbucks stock offerings and ancillary financial products like the
Starbucks store card (Theodore, 2002). Starbucks picked a good time to
enter the Japanese market because Japan was moving to deregulate financial
markets in the 1990’s (Hill, 2003). Deregulation affected the financial
options available to the individual Japanese investor and opened up opportunities
to invest in more attractive instruments than savings accounts and bonds
(Hill, 2003). Starbucks opened a corporate office in Japan in 1995; in
2001 Starbucks Coffee Japan, Ltd held its initial public offering and raised
$149 million (U.S.) (Musero, 2001).Which
exchange were the Starbucks shares sold through? NASDAQ Japan Inc. (Musero,
2001). There is no better example than the globalization of finance and
the new openness of the Japanese capital markets than an American-founded
company’s foreign division going public on an American-founded exchange’s
foreign branch.
If
the government supports universal literacy and funds a network of universities
and colleges, the population will tend to have a higher education than
in a country where the government does not support education. The Japanese
government is thoroughly involved in all aspects of both child and adult
education and provides a standardized national curriculum for elementary
and secondary education (MEXT, 2003). This is in complete contrast to the
American approach to education, where the curriculum is controlled at the
state and local school district level with occasional efforts to mandate
national standardized testing (U.S. Department of Education, 2003). Japanese
people have a 99% literacy rate; by comparison, the American literacy rate
is 97% (CIA, 2003). High education levels and literacy rates is a benefit
for Starbucks in Japan. Print advertising may be used in countries with
a high literacy rate, enhancing the visibility of advertising messages
broadcast from radio, television, or Internet advertising.
On
the other hand, government policies on immigration may cause store-staffing
problems in a nation with an aging population. The American solution to
an aging native population is to draw on immigrant and naturalized labor.
This solution is not feasible in Japan. Historically the Japanese government
has placed tight restrictions on immigration, and naturalization is very
difficult (Economist, 2000). The risk is that an aging population implies
a declining number of people willing to become barristas to run the stores
(Dawson, 1999). Will Japanese customers feel the same social comfort and
connection if foreign workers operate the stores? Can Starbucks innovate
on the Japanese affection for technology and robots to create automated
solutions for coffee making? This aspect of Japan’s social infrastructure
may be difficult for Starbucks to overcome.
Transportation
systems are another part of social infrastructure that is heavily influenced
by government policy. Starbucks can take advantage of extensive Japanese
mass transit systems to locate stores in areas of high foot traffic. The
Starbucks web site recognizes the distinction between American and Japanese
transportation patterns. American stores are locations are sorted by city
and street address, which matches a society that relies on private cars
for transportation. Japanese stores may be sorted by city and street address,
or by train stop. A majority of Japan’s Starbucks stores are located near
train stations. In this respect, Japan provides a better social infrastructure
for expansion than the United States does.
The
central question for the next five to ten years is how to sustain growth.
How does Starbucks grow beyond a niche market? A few hints of slowing momentum
have been observed in company’s sales and earnings figures (Nation’s restaurant
news, 2002). There are real business risks if the Japanese economy continues
to stagnate and unemployment increases. The Japanese saving rate may rise
in response to uncertainty about employment. If the savings rate increases,
it usually causes a corresponding decline in consumer spending (the money
has to come from somewhere). Is time in the coffee shop important enough
to the Japanese consumer to sustain the expense in the face of a bad economy?Starbucks
may be able to position their stores as a less-expensive alternative to
a restaurant. Will an increasingly older population want to drink beverages
with a high level of caffeine?Starbucks
may need to develop new beverages containing teas and herbs that appeal
to health concerns.
How
will Starbucks successfully compete for a decreasing pool of Japanese workers
without driving compensation to an unsustainable level? Starbucks may be
able to reduce staff while preserving the level of service and product
taste consistency by innovating with automated coffee making solutions.
A country that invented an automated sushi-making machine would be a good
place to experiment with automated coffee brewing and serving machinery.
There
is another interesting aspect to the interaction between Japanese government
policies and changes in the nation’s social infrastructure. The emphasis
of many government policies is to preserve social order and stability.
Japan as a whole is a group-oriented society and can seem insular and changeless.
Starbucks must be prepared to accommodate abrupt shifts in social expectations
and desires that seem to emerge unexpectedly. Change may express itself
overtly after a long period of underlying reflection and consensus building
that was not obvious to observers from a low-context business culture.
The
ten-year or longer strategic question of Starbucks’ business prospects
hinges on social influence. Can Starbucks influence social expectations
and behaviors to raise coffee rituals to a place equivalent to tea ceremonies?
Japan is a tea-drinking society. Tea ceremonies, teahouses, and tea consumption
are deeply venerated, socially important activities in Japanese society.
Perhaps Starbucks should aspire to emulate Pepsi and create a Japanese
coffee generation – thus embedding the coffee shop culture into Japan’s
social infrastructure for the next millennium.
Introduction
To
understand a country, one must know the culture.Without
a cultural understanding, a company can easily make critical errors that
result in foreign operations, which may never be profitable or even fail.In
order to determine whether or not South Korea was a suitable market for
its products, Starbucks had to take the time to learn whether or not Korean
business norms and social culture would embrace the Starbucks coffee house
experience.This paper discusses
the culture of South Korea (referred from this point forward as Korea)
in a social and business context, and provides an assessment of the impact
its cultural traits may have on Starbucks’ Korean business operations.
Korea
is a country with a strong nationalist and ethnic identity built over centuries
as protection from suffering endured under the rule of various occupying
regimes.This paper will discuss
Korea’s social culture, business culture, work ethic, and their effects
on Starbucks’ operations and future profitability.The
paper begins with a general description of Korea's social culture, followed
by its business culture.Next is
a brief exploration of Starbucks’ choice of a joint venture with a Korean
firm as the mode of entry into Korea.Finally,
the conclusion will suggest areas strength or potential problems that face
Starbucks in the future as a result of Korea’s unique, social, political,
and cultural character.
Korean
Business Culture & Relationships and Work Ethic
Korean
business culture and relationships function much the same way the social
culture interacts.There is great
importance placed on respect and deference towards one with a higher status.In
a Korean household, Confucian philosophy calls for the father to be the
stern but benevolent figure to the family.The
father is the breadwinner and provider for the family.The
same principals are applied to business relationships, which are very hierarchical
and authoritarian.The company owner
functions as the paternal role model for his employees, meeting their needs
while providing just authority. In return for this type of leadership,
the employees are expected to respect the wishes of the owner.The
same dynamics exist for the superior subordinate relationship as well (Mensik,
Grainger & Chatterjee, 2003).In
both cases, the owner/superior makes great efforts to maintain harmony
in their work environment.In order
to establish a relationship, Korean culture requires much time and energy
be given to nurturing that relationship.This
nurturing includes many informal gatherings in which both parties can interact
in a casual non-business atmosphere.In
this way, trust is slowly developed.Starbucks
began “negotiations” with Shinsegae in 1997, and perhaps earlier.However,
they did not open the first coffee house until the end of 1999 (Starbucks,
2003).During that time, Starbucks
had to form a relationship of trust with Shinsegae and the Korean government.Korean
workers work long hours for their employer.The
work ethic comes from the Confucian philosophy of perseverance.It
is understood that perseverance will inevitably allow one to reach their
goals.Starbucks’ operations would
benefit from this mentality, as it would supply them with productive, hard
working employees who are looking to advance within the company.Perception
of company status is also important.Korean
workers will want to work for Starbucks if it is perceived as a high status
company.Starbucks holds the premier
position in the gourmet coffee house market in Korea.
Starbucks’
Joint Venture in Korea
At
the time Starbucks was considering entering the Korean market (circa 1996),
they would have seen a largely government controlled banking structures,
a strongly nationalistic and ethnocentric society, and tightly knit business
relationships.They would have been
evaluating Starbucks prior to the economic crisis that occurred in 1997.At
the time they were assessing the business environment towards foreigners
they would have seen a government that was riding on a high of success
that the chaebols had enjoyed to that point on the global marketplace.The
IMF had not yet mandated the now liberal limits on foreign business ownership
in Korea.When evaluating their
options of entry (licensing, franchising, or joint ventures) Starbucks
would have had to choose a method that would penetrate the formidable barrier
the banks and government formed.This
could have been done with a franchise, but Starbucks would not have sufficient
control over operations and strategy using this approach.A
joint venture would have been their best method of entrance.Hill
(2003) explains that joint ventures can provide many advantages to a company
wishing to enter a foreign market.A
venture with a successful foreign company brings with it access to proven
business knowledge in that country, commercial and governmental contacts,
improved perception on the part of the government and the people about
the products being sold by the foreign company, and most likely, more favorable
treatment by that country’s government and banks.The
local company can also be a great help in finding the appropriate way to
market products in that country.In
1997 Starbucks began negotiations with Shinsegae Co Ltd., a large successful
corporation that owned the largest retail discount store chain, and third
largest department store chain in Korea (Park, 2002).Shinsegae
brought to the table a proven record of success in Korean retail, a native
understanding of Korean business customs, and a proven network of commercial
and government contacts.By observing
the rapid expansion of its stores in Korea since the first opened in 1999,
Starbucks has shown that the choice of a joint venture has proven successful.Hill
(2003) cautions that the potential pitfalls of a joint venture include
loss of important core technologies to the company with which the venture
was made.If poorly constructed,
Shinsegae could walk away with Starbuck’s formula for coffee house success.Starbucks
must ensure they understand the legal elements that must be in place to
ensure Shinsegae does not acquire or adopt its trade secrets.In
addition, Hill (2003) cautions that as the joint venture matures, the relationships
and perceived power base may shift in the eyes of the joint venture company.They
may begin to diverge from a unified strategy and approach to ones that
differ greatly.Shinsegae may feel
that they understand Starbucks’ philosophy of growth and strategy but have
the upper hand on implementation.Starbucks
must take great care in continually establishing who the superior is and
who the subordinate in the relationship is.It
is unknown what percentage of ownership Starbucks has in the joint venture,
but if it is 50/50 Starbucks may see a trend towards increased control
by Shinsegae.
Conclusion
The
Korean culture is strongly nationalistic with a population that is well-educated,
hard working, progressive, and conservative.It
has shown is progressiveness by remaining receptive to global business
and the difficult changes it has imposed on the country.On
the surface, the many positive traits just listed suggest Starbucks has
bright profitable future prospects there.There
is no denying that Starbucks has gotten off to a strong start, but, Starbucks
must continually monitor the sentiment of the Korean people towards American
products, increasing competition, market saturation, and the amount of
disposable income in Korean pocketbooks for leisure products.
There
are many factors that could have a severe adverse effect on Korea’s economy
in future years.Chief among these
concerns lie with North Korea. North Korea is a volatile unknown.Their
economy is badly depressed and the people suffer from illness and lack
of food.Because of these issues
and shrinking government coffers North Korea and is at a point where they
may unify with South Korea.To add
more confusion, North Korea continues to maintain a bellicose nuclear stance
that could result in war with the United States or the United Nations.If
unification or war were to occur the result would be major short term negative
affects on South Korean GDP growth.Korean
consumer sentiment would decline, as would consumer spending because its
people would not know how things were going to turn out, so they would
increase their savings rate.This
would mean that spending on non-necessity items such as Gourmet coffee
would definitely be in jeopardy.Another
result or unification or war would be a strong surge in nationalism, which
could result in a temporary rejection of things that are not Korean.This
too would have a dramatic effect on Starbucks’ profitability.Starbucks
has the additional risk of maintaining the joint venture between itself
and Shinsegae.This relationship
could deteriorate as operations grow and mature in Korea.As
Hill (2003) mentions, the challenge there will be to keep the right mixture
of power between Shinsegae and Starbucks while keeping the overall expansion
philosophy aligned.
Korea also runs the risk of economic decline if the government improperly handles the IMF mandated privatization, and corporate restructuring efforts now underway.Korean perceptions of heavy-handed IMF policies on the economy, businesses, and jobs could trigger a nationalist backlash in the country.The result could be boycotts of local businesses that iconify American economic hegemony.Fortunately, all indications are that the Korean economy is weathering the IMF changes well.Consumer confidence is high, and unemployment is a manageable 3.0%.Consumer consumption continues to grow, and consumer confidence is at an all time high.After the decline in GDP in 1998, GDP growth has been positive and increasing ever since.The projected GDP growth for 2002 was a robust 6.0% (Chan, 2002).The apparent shift towards a service economy also bodes well for Starbucks.
All
in all, the shifts in Korea’s economy caused by globalization and IMF mandates
indicate future growth and stability.Starbucks
must be wary of political unrest caused by North Korea and should have
a contingency plan in place in the event of war or unification.Starbucks
must also nurture their successful joint venture with Shinsegae to ensure
success in the future.Prospects
remain bright in Korea.
Introduction
Establishment
of a company in Japan requires a deep analysis of their business and regulatory
practices with
due consideration to the political, social/language, religious, customary
and cultural differences. Initial market entry is a challenging
process, sometimes more difficult than actually doing business itself,
as the organizational structure of the workforce and public relation arena
differ greatly from those in North America. Statutes are imposed on businesses,
such as those set by the Ministry of Finance (annual report filings), legal
affairs, and the tax authorities. Albeit the challenge, Starbucks Coffee
Chief Global Strategist and Chairman, Howard Shultz decided to take the
challenge via conducting their first foreign investment in Japan, which
demanded various start-up and growth strategies. To accomplish this feat,
Shultz formed a joint venture with a local Japanese retailer, Sazaby, Inc.
This proved to be a wise operational strategy that afforded Starbucks the
opportunity to rely on someone already ‘inside’ per se, with background
knowledge of Japan’s multi-layered and intricate business culture, which
in itself has been developing and forming new layers for thousands of years.
Sabazy was charged with taking over responsibility for growing Starbucks’
presence in Japan, which he commanded successfully, as evidenced by the
August 1996 grand opening of the first store located in the Ginza district
of Tokyo, then replicating stores across the country totaling 200 stores
by January 2001 and plans to operate 500 stores by the end of March 2004
(Hill, 2003).
This
paper outlines the Japanese value system and business ethics with respect
to the operational aspects of Starbucks Coffee, and how we, in the United
States, think of Japanese culture.Typically
one of the first images that comes to mind are those that we see in the
movies; an ancient Samurai warrior wielding his heavy sword, or a young
Geisha pouring tea and serving sushi in a Japanese Steakhouse.Each
of these elements play an important role in the entire concept of Japans’
culture as a whole, its entire meaning and history is far more complex,
however, Starbucks Coffee International has met this challenge with spectacular
success, despite the people’s preference for tea, Starbucks has rose from
obscurity to be one of the best known brands in Japan.
Japanese
Business Culture and the Starbucks Foundation
For
thousands of years, Japanese culture has mystified the Western hemisphere
with its majesty and beauty, and as one of the world’s top economic powers
we’ve happily adopted their culture into our society. However, the Japanese
have very different work and business ethics, and its unique cultural identity
affects how companies exploring foreign opportunities manage global public
relations. A global understanding of Japan’s public relations (P.R.) is
a workforce requirement for Starbucks as worldwide information on the company;
its image and financials are readily accessible on the Internet making
its mark as a ‘brand’ name.The structure
of the business world impacts the acceptance of public relations into Japanese
society, for example a popular word used amongst employees is “Karoshi,”
which translates to mean ‘death from overwork (Business and Economy).
To refute this dire connotation, Starbucks Coffee has instituted an international
foundation to ensure that its employees maintain a work/life balance. The
Mission of The Starbucks Foundation is to create hope, discovery and opportunity
in communities where Starbucks partners, employees, live and work. Contributing
positively to the community and environment is Starbucks ‘Commitment to
Origins,’ which addresses social and environmental issues in order to help
sustain the people and places that produce Starbucks coffees.
In
Japan, social ranking and status play a part in many major institutions
that one goes through in a lifetime, and ones’ age is not kept hush-hush
as it is here in the States, some companies even distribute internal newsletters
listing the age of all employees. Vertical ranking, mainly age based, determines
everything from the location of desks in a classroom, to the order in which
cups of tea are distributed in a restaurant. These rankings are even pervasive
in the Japanese language, for which age is addressed differently depending
on whether the individual is older or younger (McCargo,
2000).In business
and personal relations, the individual deemed inferior must allay their
own wants, thoughts, and opinions to that of the superior, so as not to
cause the superior individual to lose face or be humiliated. The Japanese
believe that appearance, or ‘tatemae,’ is more important than the reality
‘honne,’ hence the heavy use of make-up as seen on Geisha Girls and their
native wardrobe, which to the American workforce this may appear as hypocritical
or negative, but in Japan this is normal ethical behavior (Japan Travel
Guide.com).
The
Starbucks Foundation also addresses the Japanese concept of “wa,” meaning
group harmony, whereby the value of the common greater good is more important
than one's own needs. This principle is applied early in the value learning
system, basically commencing at school age, to the teen and social groups,
then in the workplace (Business and Economy).Starbucks
business philosophy is that nobody understands the needs of a community
like the people who live and work there, where partners are encouraged
to get involved with local youth organizations and apply for grants on
behalf of their neighborhood programs. Thereby approaching this cultural
aspect hands-on at ground level allowing Starbucks to meet the particular
needs of the people in the communities they serve by helping to build strong
relationships with their neighbors.
The
Organizational Structure of Japanese Businesses
The
Japanese business world has its own unique set of values and behavioral
patterns. In public relations, these modes of behavior must be taken into
account when working with Japanese business partners. In Japan, mutual
dependence is a way of life, referred to as “amae,” meaning the boss owes
a certain amount of protection to the employee, and that s/he assumes a
direct responsibility for the welfare of their employees (Business and
Economy).Protection is in the form
of higher compensation for years of service in conjunction with benefits
such as company paid housing, and encouraging employees to take off on
weekends and holidays, in both the industrial and retail sectors (McCargo,
2000).The longer an employee’s
tenure (as mid-life career changes are taboo), the more overall benefits
s/he shall receive, in return, employee loyalty is high. The popular American
term “job-hopping” is not a viable concept to
most
executive corporate males in Japan, as they tend to believe in ‘lifetime
employment’ within large companies. Companies tend to staff relatives and
close friends more so than an individual for which they are unfamiliar
or have no business relationship. As competition amongst companies grows
certain aspects of this so called loyalty can be seen as unfavorable, causing
the employee to passively accept transfers to undesirable locations, or
often not taking advantage of holiday entitlements (McCargo, 2000). In
response to this concept Starbucks Coffee Japan was the first company in
the country to introduce a Stock Option Plan along with a discounted stock
purchase plan for its employees.In
addition, Starbucks offers a retirement savings plan, a managerial bonus,
discounts on coffee and other products, and a progressive compensation
and benefits package (Starbucks.com).
The
Japanese value harmony and conflict management, whereby they tend to concentrate
on situation management therefore preventing conflict and crisis in the
workplace, by the common business practice of socializing after hours with
co-workers to establish credibility and friendship, for the purpose of
increasing profitability (Japan Information Network), hence the new business
buzzword “nomunication,” which combines the Japanese word “nomu” meaning
‘to drink’ with the word ‘communication,’ simply because it is ethically
acceptable for Japanese employees to socialize, unpaid, for long periods
of time discussing business. Both terms are of high importance to Japanese
corporations where the emphasis is placed on situation-based communication
to provide operational incentive guidelines.
Japan
is home to two world leading industrial corporations, Fuji and Mitsubishi,
however most of the workforce is skeptical about their companies' paternalistic
hierarchies and do not benefit from the lifetime employment concept. Despite
the fact that high-tech industrial companies contribute greatly to the
nation's economy, most of Japan's industry relies on small to medium-sized
companies with limited operations (McCargo, 2000).
Summary
Japan
is ranked as the second most technologically powerful economy in the world
after the United States (U.S.) and third largest economy in the world after
the U.S. and China.The Japanese
pride themselves with a strong work ethic, mastery of high technology and
a comparatively small defense allocation. However, public relations and
media advertising are often overlooked in Japanese commercial transactions,
basically due to the high value Japanese place on modesty and the fact
that they are inundated with ads. They believe that if an individual discusses
their own products and quality it lessens the credibility more so than
another person or organization commending their products and company (Japan
Information Network).
In
Japan, the primary model of advertising used is the ‘personal influence’
model, because the culture requires that business partners build stable
relationships by communicating with them in informal settings. The art
of practicing “giri,” which translates to mean the things people must do
or the correct way of behavior for smooth social life (O'Hara-Devereaux
and Johansen, 1994).Starbucks Coffee
believes that this starts at childhood and has since addressed this concept
with what began as a simple idea to what is now a positive environment
of lifelong learning for children, called JumpStart, via The Starbucks
Foundation through literacy grants, and the language of hope.By
collectively nurturing youth – seen as future potential employees -- they
can help create a more just, compassionate and sustainable world today
and in the future.
Overall,
Starbucks Coffee has not only adopted the traditional Japanese business
and work ethics, but has made a significant impact on their society as
demonstrated by the company’s unprecedented rapid growth. According to
Yuji Tsunoda, president of Starbucks Coffee Japan, the Starbucks Experience
has received recognition from top Japanese publications and business organizations
for its world-class customer service, uncompromising commitment to quality
coffee and the unbridled passion of its partners (Starbucks.com).In
less than five years, Starbucks became one of the most recognized and respected
global retail brands in Japan, and as they strengthen their market presence,
they are mindful of the importance of earning the trust and respect of
their customers. Given the early success and unparalleled brand equity
in the Japanese market, Starbucks Coffee Japan will continue to exceed
the expectations of their customers by offering them an experience that
goes ‘beyond’ a cup of coffee.
Hill,
C.W.L. (2003). International business with Global Resource CD, PowerWeb
and World Map (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Korea
Institute for Health and Social Affairs.Retrieved
April 29, 2003 from http://www.kihasa.re.kr/english/major/major.html
Korea
Labor Statistics Report. Retrieved April 27, 2003 from
http://kli.re.kr/kli_eng/stat_upfile/2003/200303.pdf
Korea
National Statistical Office. Retrieved May 1, 2003 from http://www.nso.go.kr/eng/
Ministry
of Education and Human Resource Development. Retrieved April 29, 2003 from
http://www.moe.go.kr/English/
Ministry
of Health, and Welfare. Retrieved May 1, 2003 from http://www.mohw.go.kr/english/index.html
Soh,
J. (February, 2003). Improving Social Welfare System top priority. The
Korea Times 9(5) Retrieved April 23, 2003 from http://times.hankooki.com/cgi-bin/hkiprn.cgi?pa=/lpage/special/200302/kt2003022510573.html
Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA). (February, 2003). The world factbook 2002: Japan.
Retrieved from the World Wide Web on April 26, 2003 from
http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ja.html
Dawson, C. (1999, October 7). Japan’s jobs dilemma. Far eastern economic review (162) 40. Retrieved from the World Wide Web from on April 29, 2003 from MdUSA database Business Source Premier.
Hill, C.W.L. (2003). International business with global resource CD, PowerWeb and World Map (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (April 23,
2003). Home page. Retrieved from the World Wide Web on April 23, 2003 from
http://www.mext.go.jp/english/
Musero, F. (2001, October 15). Tokyo Joe: Starbucks Completes Initial Public Offering In Japan. IPO Reporter (25) 39. Retrieved from the World Wide Web from on April 27, 2003 from MdUSA database Business Source Premier.
Starbucks Japan stung by earnings, sales slump. (2002, November 18). Nation’s restaurant news (36) 46. Retrieved from the World Wide Web from on May 1, 2003 from MdUSA database Business Source Premier.
The door opens, a crack. (2000, September 2). Economist (356) 8186. Retrieved from the World Wide Web from on April 29, 2003 from MdUSA database Business Source Premier.
Theodore, S. (2002, October). Expanding the coffee experience: Starbucks keeps sales brewing with new products, innovation and global expansion. Beverage industry (93)10. Retrieved from the World Wide Web from on April 27, 2003 from MdUSA database Business and company resource center.
U.S.
Department of Education. (April 24, 2003). Home page. Retrieved from the
World Wide Web on April 24, 2003 from http://www.ed.gov/index.jsp
U.S.
Department of State, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs. (June, 2002).
Background Note: Japan. Retrieved from the World Wide Web from on April
16, 2003. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/4142.htm
For
South Korea’s Business and Workforce
Chan,
A (2002). Consumer Reigns Supreme In Korean Economy. Alliance Bernstein,
Asian Economic Perspectives. Retrieved from http://institutional.alliancecapital.com/document_client_upload/040502_111522_Final_AsianPerspectives_020329.pdf
CIA
World Factbook 2002. (2003). Retrieved from http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/print/ks.html
Hill,
C. (2003). International business with Global Resource CD, PowerWeb
and World Map (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Hofstede,
G. & Bond, M. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots
to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics,
Retrieved from the
Business Source Premier database on the World Wide Web, June 2001.
Kwak,
S. (Spring, 2002). Nationalism & Productivity: The Myth Behind The
Korean Work Ethic. Harvard Asia Pacific Review. Retrieved from:
http://web.mit.edu/lipoff/www/hapr/spring02_wto/workethic.pdf
Mensik,
S., Grainger R., Chatterjee S. (2003). Trends and transitions in Japanese
and Korean Management Approaches. Retrieved from The International Trade
and Counseling Center School of Business: The Seventh International Conference
on Global Business and Economic Development at: http://blake.montclair.edu/~cibconf/conference/DATA/Theme4/Australia6.pdf
Park,
S. (2002). Heard In S Korea: Shinsegae Shares May Lose Luster. WSJ.com
Business. Retrieved from http://asia.news.yahoo.com/030205/16/r4an.html
Starbucks
Coffee Korea Co., Ltd. (2003). Retrieved from http://www.istarbucks.co.kr/
Starbucks
Corporation (2003). Retrieved from http://www.Starbucks.com
For
Japan’s Business and Workforce
Anonymous.
(March 2001). Japan Access - Japan Information Network. Ministry of Foreign
Affairs by Kodansha International Ltd. Retrieved April 16, 2003 from http://www.jinjapan.org/stat/index.html
Business
and Economy – Japan Reference.Retrieved
April 29, 2003 from http://www.japanreference.com/business_&_economy/
Hill,
C.W.L. (2003). International business with global resource CD, PowerWeb
and World Map (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Japan
Information Network. Retrieved April 29, 2003 from http://www.jinjapan.org/jd
Japan
Travel Guide.com. Japan Travel Guide - Living in Japan. Retrieved April
25, 2003 from http://www.japan-guide.com
McCargo,
D. (2000). Contemporary Japan. St. Martin's Press: New York.
O'Hara-Devereaux
, M., Johansen, R. (1994). Globalwork: bridging distance, culture, and
time. The Jossey-Bass Management: Book News.
Starbucks
Coffee Japan and Starbucks Coffee International. Retrieved February 20,
2003 from www.starbucks.com